POSITION OFFENSES BY NOTARY IN MAKING AUTHENTIC DEED: REVIEWING THE NOTARY RESPONSIBILITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32801/.v2i2.51Keywords:
Notary, Official Offenses, Deed, ResponsibilityAbstract
The research aims to analyze the notary’ responsibility as common official
who conduct contempting of court in making deed and notary’ criminal responsibility
in running the deed and criminal liability of Notary in conducting its position. The
type of research is normative-legal or also called as doctrinal research. The results
of research indicate the form of notary’ responsibility can be administrative, civil or
criminal responsibility. Especially the notary’ criminal responsibility is not clearly
regulated in the Notary Act, but its responsibility is very dependent on “deliberate”
(opzet) in notay’ conduct. In making the deed, the notary shall be responsible for
the deeds which are made there or which are intentional mistake, on the contrary if
the element of mistake occurs from the parties confronting, so as long as the Notary
conducitng ith authority in accordance with the laws and regulations, the Notary
concerned cannot be requested accountability, since the Notary simply records what
the parties are saying to be contained into a deed.
References
Anhori, Abdul Ghofur. 2009. Lembaga Kenotariatan
Indoonesia; Perspektif Hukum dan Etika. Yogyakarta: UII.
Adjie, Habib. 2009. Sanksi Perdata dan Administrasi Terhadap Notaris Sebagai Pejabat
Publik. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Adjie, Habib. 2009. Sekilas Dunia Notaris dan PPAT Indonesia. Bandung: Refika
Aditama.
Adjie, Habib. 2011. Hukum Notaris Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Syahrin, Alvi. 2010. Notaris Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pasal 266 Ayat (1) Kuhp Jo.
Pasal 55 Ayat (1) Ke-1 KUHP. http://alviprofdr.blogspot.co.id, Accessed on 29 July 2016.
Bola, M. 2017. “Legal Standing of Customary Land in Indonesia: A Comparative
Study of Land Administration Systems” Hasanuddin Law Review, 3(2), 175-190.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v3i2.1132
Christopher Stephen. (2012). “International criminal law: wielding the sword of universal
criminal justice?” International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 61(1),
-89.
Schaffmeister, D, N. Keijzer, dan E. PH. Sutorius. 2007. Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Kusumawati, Lanny. 2006. Tanggung Jawab Jabatan Notaris. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2005. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
H.R, Ridwan. 2006. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Wibowo, Rizky Adi. 2015. Arti Sebuah Rasa Tanggung Jawab. http://www.kompasiana.com/rizkyadiwibowo/arti-sebuah-rasa-tanggung-jawab. Accessed on 10 June 2016.
Saleh, Roeslan. 1983. Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana. Jakarta: Aksara Baru.
Sianturi, S.R. 1996. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan Penerapannya. Jakarta: Alumni Ahaem-Petehaem.
Supriadi. 2006. Etika dan Tanggung Jawab Profesi Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Section Policies












