PARENT COMPANY BANKRUPTCY AND CONSEQUNCES FOR INDEPENDENCE SUBSIDIARIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32801/.v2i1.35Keywords:
Bankruptcy, Holding, Company, Actio PaulinaAbstract
Provisions in the regulations No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy of the Parent Company has not set either specifically or generally. The absence of this rule results in the absence of a request suspension of obligation for payment of debts of the Parent Company have been granted by the Commercial Court. to protect the rights of creditors of the Holding Company is declared bankrupt by not reducing
the independence of subsidiaries that are not directly involved with the bankruptcy Holding Company, also to find out about the extents to which the principle of Actio Paulina in protecting the legal rights of creditors against the interests of holders of the parent company is declared bankrupt
References
Rudhi Prasetya. 2001. Kedudukan Mandiri Perseroan Terbatas; 3th edition. Bandung: Citra Karya
Bhakti Co Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang
Azikin,Zainal.2001. Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Pembayaran Di Indonesia. Cet.Jakarta:PT.Raja Grafindo Persada
Sjahdeini,Sutan Remy. 2010. Hukum Kepailitan Memahami Undang-Undang No.37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
Syahrani, Riduan. 1988. Hukum Acara Perdata DiLingkungan Peradilan Umum. Jakarta ; Pustaka Kartini
Section Policies
