Reconceptualization of the Scope of Parties in Disputes Handled by the Financial Services Sector Alternative Dispute Resolution Institution (LAPS SJK)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32801/.v10i1.211Keywords:
LAPS SJK, Regulatory disharmony, Financial dispute resolution, ReconceptualizationAbstract
The rapid growth of the financial services sector in Indonesia has increased the potential for disputes between consumers and financial service providers (PUJK), thereby necessitating an effective dispute resolution mechanism. In response, the Financial Services Authority (OJK) established the Financial Services Sector Alternative Dispute Resolution Institution (LAPS SJK) through Regulation No. 61/POJK.07/2020 as an enhancement of the previous regulation. LAPS SJK is the result of a merger of six sectoral dispute resolution institutions to simplify the resolution process across various financial service sectors. However, in its implementation, there has been a regulatory disharmony concerning the definition and scope of parties eligible to access LAPS SJK services. Law No. 4 of 2023 limits consumers to individuals, while POJK 61/2020 expands the definition to include users of PUJK services, and LAPS SJK Regulation No. 1 refers to "legal subjects," thereby making the scope more inclusive. This inconsistency creates legal uncertainty and potentially hinders access to justice. This research adopts a normative legal approach to analyze the regulatory disharmony and recommends the need for a reconceptualization of the definition of disputing parties. Harmonizing the regulations is expected to improve the effectiveness and inclusiveness of LAPS SJK in resolving disputes and strengthen legal protection in the financial services sector.
References
Books
Aufa, Muhammad Fikri, and Fadia Fitriyanti. Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan. Cetakan I. Makassar: CV. Strata Persada Academia, 2023.
Christiani, Theresia Anita. Bank Indonesia dan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Dalam Perspektif Hukum. Cetakan I. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka Kelompok Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, 2016.
Luhmann, Niklas. Law as a Social System. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004.
Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia. Menggagas Arah Kebijakan Reformasi Regulasi di Indonesia: Prosiding Forum Akademik Kebijakan Reformasi Regulasi 2019. Jakarta: Yayasan Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia, 2019.
Soemartono, R. M. Gatot P. Mengenal Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dan Arbitrase. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka, 2014.
Usman, Rachmadi. Pilihan Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan. Cetakan I. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2003.
Journal
Arifin, Zaenal, and Adhi Putra Satria. “Disharmonisasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia: Antara Bentuk, Penyebab Dan Solus.” Jurnal Pro Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik 9, no. 1 (2020): 1–10.
Bahri, Robi Assadul. “Dinamika Sistem Hukum dalam Masyarakat Pluralistik: Menguji Validitas Teori Luhmann dalam Konteks Global.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung 1, no. 3 (2024): 44–53.
Baxter, Hugh. “Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of Autopoietic Legal Systems.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 9 (November 2013): 167–84.
Busroh, Firman Freaddy, Fatria Khairo, and Putri Difa Zhafirah. “Harmonisasi Regulasi Di Indonesia: Simplikasi Dan Sinkronisasi Untuk Peningkatan Efektivitas Hukum.” Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum 5, no. 1 (2024): 699–711.
Dirkareshza, Rianda, Taupiqqurrahman Taupiqqurrahman, and Davilla Prawidya Azaria. “Optimalisasi Hukum Terhadap Lessee Yang Melakukan Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Leasing.” Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum 8, no. 2 (December 31, 2021): 160–73.
Feeley, Malcolm M. “Law, Legitimacy, and Symbols: An Expanded View of Law and Society in Transition.” Edited by Philippe Nonet and Philip Selznick. Michigan Law Review 77, no. 3 (1979): 899–907.
Junaidi, Veri, and Violla Reininda. “Relasi Presiden Dan DPR Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pada Sistem Pemerintahan Presidensial Multipartai.” Jentera: Jurnal Hukum 3, no. 1 (2020).
Kharisma, Dona Budi. “Tantangan Laps Sektor Jasa Keuangan Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Sektor Financial Technology.” Perspektif: Kajian Masalah Hukum Dan Pembangunan 26, no. 3 (2021): 216–20.
Khasanah, Chintya Ainun, and S. H. Tamsil. “Harmonisasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan terkait Izin Usaha Pertambangan (IUP) Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja.” Novum: Jurnal Hukum 9, no. 2 (2022): 41–50.
Marlina, Heni, and Serlika Aprita. “Perlindungan Konsumen dan Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (LAPS) Sektor Jasa Keuangan di Indonesia.” Jurnal Thengkyang 5, no. 1 (2020): 13–20.
Ojelabi, Lola Akin, and Mary Anne Noone. “Jurisdictional Perspectives on Alternative Dispute Resolution and Access to Justice: Introduction.” International Journal of Law in Context. Cambridge University Press, 2020.
Parma, Bains. “BigTech in Financial Services: Regulatory Approaches and Architecture.” International Monetary Fund, No. 1 (2022).
Ramadhan, Alif Rizqi, and Albertus Sentot Sudarwanto. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Kebocoran Data Pribadi Nasabah Bank Melalui Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan (LAPS SJK).” Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hukum 1, no. 2 (2023).
Saputra, Imran Eka, and Ali Rahman. “Reformasi Sistem Perundang-Undangan Indonesia: Strategi Pembentukan Lembaga Independen Untuk Menangani Hiper-Regulasi: Reform of Indonesia’s Legal System: Strategies for Establishing Independent Institutions to Address Hyper-Regulation.” JAPHTN-HAN 3, no. 1 (2024): 69–88.
Slamet, Kusnu Goesniadhie. “Harmonisasi Hukum Dalam Perspektif Perundang-Undangan.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 11, no. 27 (June 8, 2016): 82–96.
Upita Anggunsuri. “Independensi Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (Pasca Diundangkan Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 Tentang Penguatan Dan Pengembangan Jasa Keuangan).” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 31, no. 2 (2024): 312–36.
Utomo, Benedetto Setyo. “Upaya Mediasi Melalui Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan (LAPS SJK): (Studi Kasus Sengketa Rehabilitasi Daftar Hitam Nasional (DHN) PT X Dan BRI).” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 53, no. 3 (2023): 494–512.
Internet
Fachri, Ferinda K. “Begini Implikasi UU PPSK terhadap LAPS SJK dan Industri Fintech.” Hukumonline. accessed February 25 2025. https://www.hukum online.com/berita/a/begini-implikasi-uu-ppsk-terhadap-laps-sjk-dan-industri-fintech-lt63fca94633755/.
Freeman, Samuel. “Original Position.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Last modified 2023. Accessed March 16, 2025. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ original-position/.
LAPS SJK. “Sejarah.” LAPS SJK. Accessed November 22, 2024. https://lapssjk. companyprofile .co.id/sejarah/.
Section Policies
